Showing posts with label India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India. Show all posts

Monday, April 8, 2013

RBI, Government, Inflation and Price Rise


While it is quite clear that the only plausible reason for ever increasing price rise is the printing press that is being controlled by the RBI through which it keeps creating new money out of thin air, the Government and the RBI governor keep offering ridiculously insane excuses to shun away from their defaults. The basic reason behind price rise is the inflationary policy of Indian government and RBI as both of them work in collusion.

To help those banks and to finance for some extremely ridiculous socialist populist policies of government, such as education for all, healthcare for all, food for all etc. ((How India is Becoming a Totalitarian State, a Brave New World)),  the RBI kept pushing new money in Indian economy. The result was obvious, inflation kept creeping up while our Prime Minister of UPA government Mr. Manmohan Singh kept promising that prices of commodities and food articles will come down within next six months. He is Keynesian economist and it’s not like Mr. Manmohan Singh doesn’t know the real cause of price rise, he is intelligent enough to understand the basic flaws of Keynesian economics well. It doesn't take an Eisnstien's brain to understand the Broken Window Fallacy. So, while the MNREGA and other similar forced employment provision policies by government encourages rural people to break windows and recreate them, or dig holes and refill them to attain governmental aid in form of salaries, politicians like Beni Prasad Verma feels happy that prices of food items are going high, as now farmers can earn more.

Now when the government and RBI have *literally* accepted that they can't do anything to reduce price rises (as the dragon of inflation has already been driven out of the closet in the streets), the politicians and the Governor or Reserve Bank of India are offering ridiculous excuses for the extreme price rises.

I have explained the basic reason behind price rise and economic crisis in India ((Explaining Indian Economic Crisis)), while the government is yet to affirm that Indian economy is on a downtrodden road. I also have clearly explained the fundamental difference between inflation (the cause) and price rise (the result) ((Reason Behind Indian Inflation)). However, governmental economists, including the Governor of RBI, Mr. Subbrao are yet to learn the difference between inflation and price rise. In addition, the Indian government, Indian corporate, and Indian banks are conspiring to ease out the way of further increasing inflation. It should be noted that Keynesian economists historically offer more poison as the cure for the poison they already have created. This is the reason why there is no difference between an economically illiterate Beni Prasad Verma and well educated Keynesian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, or Governor of RBI Mr. D Subbarao who, recently, made an excellent Keynesian excuse against the complains of ever mounting price rise in food and commodity sector. According to D. Subbarao, the income of rural Indians and poor people are increasing and hence they are eating more, eating better and this is the main reason for the increasing price rises of food articles ((There's a small satire over this statement by D. Subbarao, RBI Governor's Request to End Malnutrition Campaign))
It should be noted that in 2007, just before accepting the enormous economic crisis, the former President of the United States, George W. Bush also claimed that the cause of “inflation” in food articles in the US is the fact that the poor people in Asian countries are now eating more, eating better. So, Bush can sue D. Subbarao for copying his “idea” about price rise of food articles. However, neither Bush, nor D. Subbarao understand the basic economic fact that inflation is not price rise, rather it is the cause of price rise and inflation is not caused by people eating more, inflation is caused by government and central banks, printing more money out of thin air.

What could be the Reasons Behind These Ridiculous Excuses for Price Rise?

The major reason behind such dumb excuses is that while these Keynesian crooks know their crimes, they also know that Indian populace in general is yet not aware of the economic facts and can take the false pill that suggests that price rise is prosperity, war is peace, truth is false and black is white.

It is a known fact that Indian GDP is continuously decreasing and the reason behind this is the inflationary policy of government that triggered the boom and bust cycle in Indian economy. During the boom time, Congress enjoyed the credit for higher GDP, now when the false growth rate and forced maladjustment in economy are causing problems, the government has no way but to infuse more false money to keep on their false propaganda of economic reforms. This is necessary to fool Indian public again so that the UPA may again try to grab the ruling power. Obviously, this is all about grabbing the ruling power on innocent shepherds of India. This is why Finance Minister P. Chidambaram is trying hard to convince corporate and banks to continue those 215 projects that have been stalled because of the fact that there is no real savings for expanding the production structure of India. This is the reason why there are 126 more such projects for which the Indian banks have already offered loans, but the entrepreneurs are not interested in taking risk of wasting those loans by starting those projects. And this is the exact reason why Indian Banks are demanding free hand to create credit expansion, which in turn will increase inflation or may be hyperinflation, which will cause extreme price rise while ddestroying the basic threads of Indian economy and these crooks will continue offering ridiculous excuses ((The Fradulent Mix of Government, Corporate and State Bank of India)) .

These Keynesian crooks strictly want entrepreneurs to gamble on the loans, however, entrepreneurs realize that the Indian society yet not have increased their voluntary savings enough to continue major projects that could expand the production process and hence, the whole economic structure of India. This, in fact is the phase where businessmen have realized that there is no real money and all that money which is being offered by government and banks is fake, printed money with no backing of real voulntary savings and such money can only cause an increase in price rises, which will also increases the expenses of entrepreneurs and businessmen and will cause extreme losses for them. 
However, with all these bailouts and forced enthusiasm, the government will succeed in causing more maladjustment and economic blunders and what will be the result? An extreme economic crisis in India is awaiting to write history. However, as someone said, Systems have to crumble before they can be rebuilt differently.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Pakistan, cricket, terrorism and conspiracy

After the terrorist attack on Srilanka cricket team, Pakistan government is playing the cards of blame game again.

Lahore commissioner Pervez Khusro said, we could not rule out Indian involvement in the terror attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team.

A retired ISI official Rt. General Hameed Gul said that India was trying to weaken Pakistan, India wanted to declare Pakistan a terrorist state and the firing on Sri Lankan cricket team is a part of that conspiracy.(more on Times of India)

This is not the first time when Pakistan tried to colour its fallacies, intelligence failure and security lapses as some conspiracy against Pakistan. Even Indian government do the same. It seems like a cats fight, Indian government will blame Pakistan for every Indian security failure, and Pakistan government will blame India for its own security failure.

Conspiracy has become cliché, too much overused.

Yet all these incidents significantly shows one reality and that is, governments are seriously unable to protect common citizens, even they cannot protect a foreign delegate. Now since in a government ruled state, there is monopoly of government over the security system, they seriously lack any competitive check for their own failures and blaming the other countries becomes a hide out for them.

The common man in the absence of any better alternative find himself forced to believe such blames and that further infuriates the environment, creating further grounds of discontent, disbelief and hatred.

It is not hard to realize that the terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan team simply suggest that the security net was thoroughly breached by terrorists, they had information about the route through which team will be headed to the Gaddaffi cricket ground, they exactly knew how much security guards will be there with the Sri Lankan team. Anyone can surmise that the terrorists has all prior knowledge and hence they were able to plan the attack in such a managed way, that is, the terrorists have connections within the security services of Pakistan too.

In case of Hotel Taj attack also, we simply cannot rule out the possibilities of help for the terrorists to implement their attacking plan from within Indian borders. Furthermore, just like Pakistan had prior information that some terrorists may try to attack and harm the Sri Lankan team, Indian intelligence and government had information about a possible terrorist attack at specific points of Mumbai, and yet the intelligence and security services failed.

The way Indian and Pakistan government blames each other for conspiracies and support for terrorist attacks just strengthen the illusion that a country can stabilize and progress only at the cost of the failure of other state. Now that is a blatant lie.

If the neighbouring states of India remain in troubled waters, even India cannot maintain peace, individual liberty, security and progress, and this is true for other neighbouring states too.

The very basic and simple idea of cumulative progress is the environment of peace, justice, individual liberty and security within whole of the Indian sub-continent and adjoining states. A failure of Pakistan or Bangladesh or Sri Lanka cannot help India, nor does a terrorist attack on India help any other country by any means. Such acts can destroy progress, wealth and human life only; they cannot bring forth any sort of progress or success.

Yet, the states are unable to provide any secure, peaceful friendly and trustworthy environment and that aborts any try to improve the human life and its standards.

It is very easy to claim that certain brutal minds cause such havoc. Some may blame fundamentalist nature of Islam Taliban and other insurgent groups and to insure safety against such insurgent groups, they will claim strong government is necessary.

So can we say that Pakistan was better under military rule of Pervez Musharraf?

Often people ignore the fact that the real cause of such fissures in intelligence and security system actually signifies the failure of the government system. India is suffering similar failure and nobody has any solution.

Furthermore, when there are inklings that the terrorist have some links in the inner realms of security departments, we cannot expect a proper investigation and a justified trial for the real conspirators and criminals behind the crime.

Overall, the situation is fuzzed up.

The security lapses although can be rectified, yet can any government monopoly provide a proper security system progressive and competitive enough?

With whom will they compete and on what grounds.

Obviously, when they have no solution for the existing problems, they will keep blaming each other in hope of gaining some sort of relief.

Ultimately, it would be the individuals who will need to give up their subjective view point and will have to realize the sanctity of life; they will have to realize the importance of peace, freedom, happiness and they will have to realize the importance to defend themselves too.

Let us hope that apart from engaging in blame games, and announcing restrictive laws on common innocent citizens, these governments will take some positive steps to solve out the problem of terrorism and militancy.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Freedom of Speech and Expression


Blogging is not an art, it is rather an expression of freedom, and it is a power to let you realize yourself. On his page, the bloggers expresses himself uninhibitedly about anything he prefers to express about freely.

Now Indian bloggers can not do so, they may blog, yet they cannot blog freely.

They need to limit themselves about what they are talking about and how they are expressing themselves because Supreme Court of India says that the blogger may face libel charges and even prosecution for their blog content. Bloggers can be nailed for views.

Not only that, the bloggers needs to look for the content of the commenter on their blog as the blogger will be considered responsible for all the raunchy, caustic or abusive comments on any issue.

The Supreme Court refused to protect a 19 year old boy named Ajith D against the summons from Maharashtra court on a criminal case filed against him for starting a virtual community on Orkut against Shiv Sena.

Totalitarianism is official now, you may have the ways to express but you cannot express and if you do, be prepared to face the consequences.

Some months ago, when a blogger expressed his views against NDTV's live coverage of Mumbai terrorist attacks, he also faced warnings of libel and he had to remove and apologize for his post.

This case is a step forward. Ajith D is facing a criminal charge, the FIR against him is registered under Sections 506 and 295A pertaining to hurting public sentiments.

So here is the efficiency of Indian judiciary system. We cannot say for how long the kid will suffer now.

The issue of hurting public sentiments is a bit crap idea. What will not hurt the public sentiments?

If someone raises the issue of legalizing prostitution, it hurts public sentiments, if someone raises issue of legalizing alcohol, drugs or even abortions it hurts public sentiments. If someone opposes taxes and governmental policies, bail outs and economic stimulus, that also hurts public sentiments. Say anything and that will hurt public sentiment because public has no face.

Thus, remain dumb and numb and do not speak out, otherwise, someone will nail you down officially.

Ohh well you have freedom of speech and expression, so what is someone complains and file an FIR against you? You should go to court and explain your conduct, explain how you were not committing any crime but just trying to exercise your fundamental right of expression, fight for your right you may win.

Fundamental right of expression! What a cliché.

One needs to understand the humour behind the idea of fundamental rights.

Democracy is Comedy

American presidential election 2008 gave a new synonym for the change, and that was Obama. Obama, a youth politician with big plans and hope to bring about a utopian "change", able to give a dream to American youth, that "yes, they can", they can bring about a change to make their wild dreams come true, if Obama leads them, they can see a unicorn in day light ready to ride them to the colourful destiny of equality, free education, free jobs, free food, free healthcare, free and safe water, pollution free power, security against failure, and all a dreamer can dream for.
Ohh yes, dreams come true, they do. America is turning red as fast as it can.
Now the political wave is heating Indian arena, the general election of 2009.
Voters often complains that Indian political frame doesn't provide young politicians full of energy, hope and dreams to bring about the much awaited "change" they look for.
So here are some good news for these voters, here are some young politicians entering in the political arena with a gracious guile looking for the support of voters to bring about that change.
You might have enjoyed Shekhar Suman commenting on political news and analysis each Sunday in his program at Star News "Pol Khol" with his acute sense of humour and presence of mind, clarifying the pictures and putting them in better position.

You might have enjoyed Shekhar Suman judging the comedy skills of Raju Shrivastav too, now when Raju Shrivastava is likely to contest LokSabha election from the side of congress, how will Shekhar Suman project news related to him? Obviously, it will be much more comedy from the sides of Indian parliament.
Well we can expect this much from politicians, to provide us a good comedy show.
I guess it will benefit Indian Television and radio ministry too, as now DD1 may gather more TRP's for its live coverage of parliamentary debates and sessions.
Instead of shoe throwing games, we can expect some Jokes.
Former cricket player Moh. Azharuddin is also set forth to contest in the upcoming election. Congress have invited him to win a seat for them. He was removed from Indian cricket team for some complains of match fixing and corruption.

Munna Bhai MBBS a.k.a Sanjay Dutt already has decided to contest the election for SamajWadi party.
So here is the bait, choose the young famous politicians, and decide the future of democracy.
I wonder if Indians really deserve any better politicians then these, or are there any better politicians then these in whole political spectrum of India?
So true, democracy is comedy.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Learning the Right Ways



The new saffron group, Ram Sena's supremo Mr. Muthalik showed that he knows what is difference between peace and violence, protest and hooliganism.

Rediff news informs that Mr Muthalik said

"We have no intention of creating trouble for anyone and neither will we resort to any violence," Muthalik stated. "In case any of our activists find anyone dressed indecently, then we will just protest in front of them," he added.

Ok there is no wrong in that, although it is not a matter of Ram Sena or anybody else to suggest what is decent and what is Indecent. Yet, if they keep their protest decent and peaceful, one can fathom that.

Anyways, I am not much interested in V-Day or V-Day celebrations, it is a useless issue.

In Madhya Pradesh also there will be some protests against V-Day and in favour of V-Day!

As protesters from both sides will protest and do various kinds of dramatics regarding their views, I personally want to make an appeal to both of the groups the Pro-V-Day supporters and Anti-V-Day supporters to let the commoners go by easily, please DO NOT disturb traffic, do not burn buses do not break shops window panes and doors, do not start abusing each other please do not throw stones on each other, Please avoid any sort of hooliganism for any cause, and follow the words of peace protests you are promising!

Monday, February 9, 2009

Indian Hypocrisy

Since the US government and senators started imposing a ban on H-1 B hiring for companies looking for revival through bail outs, every Indian reporter, columnist, economist and even common bloggers started criticizing the protectionist move.

Even I criticized that protectionist move, as obviously, protectionism is not ONLY harmful for foreign workers, it is harmful for US and US citizens too.

Yet, whenever I read any criticism from Indian columnists, reporters and bloggers, one question kept hitting my mind, Why this hypocrisy?

After all, what USA senate is trying to do, is it something new which Indian government is not already doing?

Actually such sort of protectionism is nothing but similar kind of "Reservation" Indian government imposes on Indian citizens and they accept it with open heart, by providing reservations on the name of caste, creed, religion and class.
Here, US government is providing reservations for US citizens. it should be nothing new to Indians. Actually, there were days when Indian Government was learning reasonable, right and good from USA government, now situations are opposite, USA government is learning irrational, wrong and worst from Indian government.

Any Indian blogger, reporter, columnist, who is criticizing American protectionism although he supports reservations, subsidies etc by Indian government, is a big liar, and hypocrit and nothing else.

As for me, I oppose any sort of governmental interference.
more on RFL.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Economic Crisis and India

So a new government report shows that Indians lost 500,000 jobs in India. Rediff news


Yet MOIA is thinking more about help package for those who are returning from foreign states.

Why?
There can be two reason.
First is, Indian government really want to profess that its foreign countries that suffered the major blow of recession, and India is doing fine. After all, it is election period, no government will feel good about exposing the reality. So, by promoting help packages for foreigners and ignoring Indians who lost job in India, government is playing safe.

Second thing is, the number of job lost can be so high (which obviously have not been displayed yet) that government knows it is useless to talk of any unemployment help package.

In any case, it is good for Indians if government keeps away from the idea of economic stimulus for anyone.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

The Emotional Economy plan

Recently, Indian government announced a proceeding in making of a new fund to provide economic stimulus to those Indian workers who were working outside India, but due to economic crisis and loss of jobs, may now return back to India.

Ok, how good it feels to help the Indian brothers who went away for making big millions of dollars and now are coming back as their jobs are no more.

MOIA, (The Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs), is planning to ponder over an amount of Rs10 crores every year to help such workers. "ET News"

It is just a form of economic stimulus by India to overcome the issue of economic crisis. Let us discuss over it.

Not only those who went away in search of big money better jobs are loosing money, but the Indian compatriots who are dependent on production industry are loosing jobs, to say clearly, India is in huge economic crisis, yet government supported Indian new channels keep showing some fake Osama stories and economic crisis of USA, and other nations, as if India is untouched by any such crisis, and ohh yea why not, after all India is well-regulated mixed economy, how can it crumble. Yet that is not the fact. Indian government has already provided economic stimulus for Indian markets and we have shown that such stimulus will only increase the tenure of crisis.

When compared with huge amounts like Rs2000 crores, these Rs10 crores per year may seem nothing, but ultimately the Indian citizens have to pay these Rs10 crores too, it is a burden on Indian citizens as it will increase Fiscal deficit and put further debt on Indians.

Now let us discuss about Unemployment.

Unemployment is a situation when a worker is not working because either he is not getting any work, or he considers the available works not apt for him, as he is much better than doing those jobs.

It is simply not possible to not get any work, as there always remains a situation to do some work or other to gain an honest living that is what entrepreneurship is.

Yet, if a person is not working because all the available jobs he considers of low standards than what he is capable of, then it is a voluntary unemployment. That is, the worker is not working by his choice.

Consider this, a software engineer who was working in Florida someday ago at an annual package of Rs1.20 crores per annum, is now unemployed. He comes back to India. He can easily get a job in India, but he cannot get same salary package.

He was working at a salary of Rs 1 lakh per month, now he do not want to work for an annual package of Rs 2 lakh 40 thousand per annum, that is Rs15,000 per months.

Since he does not want to work at this lower salary, he is not working it is his own choice. Can we say that he is Unemployed? Yes, well he is voluntary unemployed.

Do we need to help him by any economic plan of say Rs 10 crores per annum (As MOIA is thinking about)? No, when he is not even ready to work for Rs15,000 per annum, why will he agree to beg, and if he really feel that he is in dire situation and he needs money any how, he will start working for Rs15,000 per month or even less.

A poor will be more than enough happy about getting a job of Rs2,000 per month too.

So, why providing any stimulus plan for such workers, who are returning to India because they lost their better salary providing jobs.

Someday ago, when Air India announced that it is planning to send about 15,000 workers on pay-less salaries, political parties opposed the move, but when there is no money to keep those high profile rich salary jobs, how is it possible to keep maintaining those jobs? It is simply a bad investment or "Non-Productive-Asset".

Only such Malinvestment and "Non-productive assets" actually increases economic burden and causes economic crisis.

Thus, MOIA is not planning to "help" some returnees from foreign, but it is planning to sustain economic crisis, and why is it doing so? To gain some emotional vote bank?


I will be writing more on Unemployment on ReasonForLiberty soon.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Public Display of Affection

It is not about superstar Richard Gerre and superfamous Big Boss girl Shilpa Shetty.
We complained against saffron group when they objected over the kissing incidence between the two famous personalities. May be it was a way to gather attention.
What if a common man and his wife are taken in police custody by the government police just because they were kissing alongside a railway station?
That is how the world's largest democracy works. You need to look before expressing your most honest and legitimate emotions. Police may call it obscene you know, police decides what is moral and what Indian culture is.
The good thing is Court dismissed any sort of criminal proceeding against the couple, yes the married couple. At least Indian court allows a man to kiss his wife, yet Police may beat a man's ass for doing so.
Yet, courts are also not so flexible, an Israeli couple was fined $22 for kissing after getting married in a Hindu ceremony in Rajasthan. Can you believe this? A newly married husband cannot kiss the wife in India, because it is India.
We can conveniently pee near bushes and other public places kisses by even married couples is not allowed.
Is it the problem of those saffron brands or is this the problem of well-educated next generation youth of India, the same youngistan?
In 2004, when some college students of Bangalore were interviewed, most of the male students expressed their opposition to Public Displays of Affection (PDA) while most of the girls were in favour of it. Yes, Indian girls are more open minded about the issue.
It is not only about kissing; people do not support public hugging between girls and boys too. Ahh boys cannot give "Jaddu ki Jhappi" to girls, sorry Munnabhai!
When Ram Sena attacked public pubs in Mangalore, all blamed the saffron group, yet in comments to Times of India Editor desk in 2007, most of young educated Indians with no connection of saffron group were opposing the idea of pub, smooching, kissing hugging in public places.
Is that why the kissing dragon Emran Hashmi being praised by some Indians? He may bring some "revolution" in India regarding Public Display of Affection.
The question is, is kissing really alien to Indians?
Historical facts suggest that Indians discovered the art of smooching and kissing.
Four Vedic Sanskrit texts, written in India around 1500 B.C., appear to describe people kissing.
In Mahabharat, kissing on lips is described as sign of affection, Vatsyayana Kamasutram, (Kamasutra) also describes variety of kisses. I am sure most of the Indians do not realize it now. Yet, the problem is not about kissing, it is about Public Display of Affection.
It is none of other's business what people do in their private life, but everybody started getting the pinch of salt if it is a public display of affection. Obviously it describes the importance of private property again.
For most of the people, watching Public Display of Affection becomes either amusing or embarrassing because Indian's are still not used to it. If a girl goes with a boy, taking his hand in hers on roads, everybody will stare.
Not all think it is wrong, immoral, or even disturbing. Watching couples, including newly-weds holding their hands or putting their arms around each other makes one feel happy, happy about the happiness and satisfaction of life, about the idea that all is going well. Even elder Indians does not think it is very forward or awkward when a recently wed-couple hold hands and walk in public places, one may see many old couples too walking in public gardens holding their hands together gossiping about their old days, ohh yea the dearly oldie love stories of their passed young life. Yet, if some young couple do the same in front of those old couple in public, they may feel embarrassed, disturbed, or disrespected?
In Indian colleges, girls and boys may suffer harsh punishment including suspensions if they are found roaming around with each other with necking or kissing each other.
Not all colleges are like that; Jaipur MNIT was not like that. I know it was full of full of Romeos and Juliets, some of them are married couples now. That's how life goes, guys and girls attracts, kisses, have sex, marries and make a good beautiful happy satisfied couple.
Anyways, let us think for a while, what makes kissing or smooching in public place a crime? Why should police need to arrest the couples kissing in public place? The same police which is just ineffective in every other department, why does it start showing its efficiencies in harassing honest innocent citizens.
Kissing in public is not at all an offence, not even of the type of victimless offence.
Yet all cultures, not all countries provide similar liberties to the individuals.
Now here is the hypocrisy, the same Indians who usually enjoy the boldness of the opportunity to diplay their affection publicly when they go outside India, may not support idea of PDA in India.
India is a country which provides liberty to pee here and there and spit gutkhas out there on roads, bus stands and railway stations. Yet one cannot display any sort of affection to the one he loves on the same railway station.
One can guess why the rigid irrational common legal ideas about date rapes can become extreme tyranny in India.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

The Human Rights and Self-Governance


After the mutiny of 1857, when Indian intellectuals started gathering up and knitting up a base for the development of Individual against Society, the sounds of Self-governance started to evolve from the farms and streets of Indian society. It was the first evidence that the imaginary of society was loosing grips over the Individual, and Individual was struggling for his Independence, his own freedom. That was the importance of Bal Ganga Dhar Tilak's call for self-governance. When he said "Swaraj Mera janmsiddh Adhikar hai" (Self-governance is my birth right), He obviously did not mean that he wanted to take power away from British rulers to become the ruler of India himself. He strictly meant that he recognizes no government over him, and self-governance of his own life on his own voluntary terms is his birth right.

Before talking of "Birth Right" we must understand the term "Right" what does it mean.

A right is the moral standard, which allows a man's freedom to act in a social premise.

There can be only one fundamental right and that is, a man's right to own his life to be free of any obligation to not to be a birth-slave to anybody. All other rights are just the consequences or results of this fundamental right, the right of an Individual to own his life. Life is a self-generated actions, the right to own one's life is to self-governance oneself, to be free to take all the actions required by the nature of a thinking man to support, progress, aspire, fulfil and enjoy his own life. Such is the meaning of Self-Governance, or Swaraj. As Bal Gangadhar Tilak stated, it is a birth right.

Self-governance means freedom of action, freedom from any sort of physical coercion, compulsion or intrusion by other men, or society. Thus, the right of freedom, of Self-Governance means a moral allowance of a positive kind for an Individual to act freely on his voluntary judgment, for his chosen goals, by un-coerced choice. His actions cannot be restrictive to other individual of the society, as all have this right of Self-Governance.

Every other consecutive rights of the right of self-governance are the rights of actions to lead a free life. Freedom of speech, expression, and even the right to property, is the right of action. Right to property is not a right to an object, it is a right to act to earn that object, or to create it.

In 1947, there happened a shift of ruling power from British government to a democratic government of India, chosen by the will of political freedom. Thus, Indians acquired a political right on 15th of August 1947.

Political freedom means the freedom to gather or attach with any political party freely without any physical coercion. It certainly was the first step towards the Individual Freedom, the sovereignty and Self-Governance of an Individual.

Yet, India was not freed, it remained under an amendable constitution based on which, the government rule was applied on Individuals, neglecting their Birth right of Self-Governance and making up a social right base instead of Individual Right base, hence forcing the Individual to sacrifice for the so-called imaginary good of imaginary society.

  1. Right to equality
  2. Right to freedom
  3. Right against exploitation
  4. Right to freedom of Religion
  5. Cultural and educational rights
  6. Right to constitutional remedies

Right to equality certifies that the state cannot discriminate against anyone on the basis of caste, creed, colour, sex, religion or place of birth. Yet, constitution itself provided powers to the state to discriminate people on the basis of caste and sex by allowing state to divide people and rule over them by playing "reservation game". Since India never accepted an Individual's right to property, he always remained a slave of government, and hence government became a legitimate owner of whatever a Man earns or produce, he has no right on whatever he creates. First, he needs permission to create and then a permission to enjoy his creation. (see here)

There is a right to freedom, yet it is bound with emotional restrictions. Since there is no property right, No one can say or express anything, which may hurt societal emotions, there is censorship which only government can enforce.

Thus, even after gaining Independence from foreign rulers, Indian were enslaved with the majority rule of society where every Individual is enforced and coerced to "sacrifice" his life. No one got any right to Self-Governance which Bal Gangadhar Tilak aspired as their Birth Right. While the socialist leaders of India kept increasing the list of various rights to delude Individuals. It became a collectivist tyranny.

Collectivist rulers do not enslave a country by confiscating its values, material or moral. The collectivists proceed through internal corruption, to make Individual sacrifice his existence and to suffer. It provides a fake sense of "rights". In the cloud of these rights, the fundamental right of Self-Governance is negated and mystified.